in Features

Decontaminising supply chains

Posted 17 June 2019 · Add Comment

Dr David Scrimshire, Managing Director of TEC Transnational, examines problems caused by conflict minerals and counterfeit parts in the supply chain.

Counterfeiting has a long and ignoble history, ranging from art and literature to manufactured goods. Unlike other industries, counterfeiting in the aerospace and defence sectors may have life or death consequences.

Although it is clear that counterfeit parts do enter the supply chain, the time and place of their entry is unpredictable. Managing this uncertainty has become more important due to the recent rise in the incidence of counterfeit reporting.

Most of us are aware of ‘blood diamonds’ (also called conflict diamonds) which are diamonds mined in a war zone and sold to finance an insurgency, an invading army's war efforts, or a warlord's activity. What may be less well-known are conflict minerals which share a similar pedigree and may inadvertently enter the supply chain. They include tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold (referred to as ‘3TG’).

Recent legislative and regulatory initiatives by the OECD and EU seek to keep such ‘contaminated minerals’ out of the industrial supply chain by requiring organisations to prove that such minerals are either not from conflict-affected areas or that their production and trade have not contributed to conflict financing and human rights abuses.

What are counterfeit parts?
The following definitions are common to all standards and regulations relating to counterfeit parts:

  • Counterfeit Part – a fraudulent part that has been confirmed to be a copy, imitation, or substitute that has been represented, identified, or marked as genuine, and/or altered by a source without legal right with intent to mislead, deceive, or defraud
  • Fraudulent Part – any suspect part misrepresented to the customer as meeting the customer’s requirements (includes Fraudulent recycled – sold as new 'unused')
  • Suspect Part – a part in which there is an indication that it may have been misrepresented by the supplier or manufacturer and may meet the generic definition of fraudulent part or counterfeit part

Examples of a counterfeit part can include but are not limited to, the false identification of marking or labelling, grade, serial number, date code, documentation, or performance characteristics. Although most of the focus is on ‘EEE’ (Electrical, Electronic, and Electromechanical) parts, the principles and practices are applicable to other commodity types, including:

  • raw materials
  • outsourced special processes
  • mechanical components
  • standard and COTs parts
  • IT and communications technology

Plus, all types of ‘matériel’ (i.e. the aggregate of ‘things used’ or ‘needed’ by any organisation for the production of its products – distinguished from personnel).

What are conflict minerals?
In conflict-affected and high-risk areas of the world, organisations involved in mining and trade in minerals have the potential to generate income, growth and prosperity, sustain livelihoods and foster local development. Unfortunately, they may also be at risk of contributing to, or being associated with, significant adverse impacts including serious human rights abuses and conflict. The minerals that pose the greatest threats are tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold, collectively known as ‘3TG’.

For example, conflict minerals have for some years been a particular problem in minerals sourced from conflict-affected areas of the eastern DRC (Democratic Republic of Congo). The DRC’s mineral wealth is enormous. It is estimated that this country contains between 65-80% of the world’s columbite-tantalite (coltan) reserves, 49% of its cobalt reserves and 3% of its copper reserves.

Organisations can, knowingly or unknowingly, be affected by the risk of supply chain ‘contamination’ with conflict minerals. This can occur at a number of stages,
whether mining or trading in the eastern provinces of DRC, in an adjoining country, or further along the chain.

Meeting customer and international requirements
At this time the following three standards contain requirements relating to
counterfeit parts:

  • AS5553:2016 Rev B
  • IEC TS 62668-1:2016
  • AS9100:2016 Rev D

Organisations must plan, implement and control processes, appropriate to their operations and the product, for the prevention of counterfeit or suspect counterfeit parts use and their inclusion in product(s) delivered to the customer. Such processes should consider:
─ training of appropriate persons in the awareness and prevention of
counterfeit parts;
─ application of a parts obsolescence monitoring programme;
─ controls for acquiring externally provided product
─ requirements for assuring traceability of parts and components to their
original or authorised manufacturers;
─ verification and test methodologies
─ monitoring of counterfeit parts reporting from external sources;
─ quarantine and reporting of suspect or detected counterfeit parts

To minimise the risk of counterfeit matériel the golden rule is to only use authorised suppliers; preferably using stockists which are AS9120:2016 certified.

Recent guidance and regulatory initiatives seeking to keep conflict minerals out of the industry supply chain include:

  • OECD Due Diligence Guidance (available now)
  • European Union adopted Regulation (EU) 2017/821 (in force 2021)

The term ‘due diligence’ means acting with reasonable care and investigating an issue before making a decision on procurement. In other words, it is an on-going, proactive (and reactive) process through which organisations put in place actions to make sure they are able to identify, manage and report on ‘3TG’ risks in their supply chain.

Organisations are advised to formulate their own supply chain policy to conform to the OECD Due Diligence Guidance outlining the ‘3TG’ risks of significant adverse
impacts of conflict minerals. Once the policy has been documented, the organisation must adopt and clearly communicate to suppliers and interested parties, up-to-date information on the policy.


 

* required field

Post a comment

Other Stories
Advertisement
Latest News

Dstl scientists helping conquer spread of COVID-19

The Defence Science and Technology Laboratory (Dstl) is carrying out vital work in partnership with a number of organisations including Public Health England (PHE) and the National Health Service (NHS) to get the COVID-19 outbreak

ALA acquires Germany based Industrio GmbH

ADS member ALA Advanced Logistics for Aerospace, has acquired a majority stake in Germany based Industrio GmbH.

Airspace User Portal to be suspended

From 30th April 2020, drone users, General Aviation pilots and those submitting Non-Standard Flight (NSF) applications will no longer be able to do so via the Airspace User Portal (AUP), so after that date, users should revert to the

Serco awarded US Space Force contract

Serco Inc. has been awarded a new contract from the US Space Force to manage, operate and maintain the Ground-Based Electro-Optical Deep Space Surveillance (GEODSS) system.

BAE Systems helping protect NHS frontline staff

BAE Systems are donating more than 120,000 face shields to help protect NHS staff on the frontline providing care for those suffering from coronavirus.

UK Government defers air navigation charges

Airlines will be able to temporarily defer the payment of air navigation charges, saving them tens of millions of pounds, following action from the UK Government.

AVMENA20 SK14191020
See us at
SMI favws BT0602040620DVD 20203CDSE BT2702150720