in Features

Why good times are a good time to reduce your overheads

Posted 18 March 2014 · Add Comment

Despite buoyant order books, now is the time for aerospace suppliers to tackle indirect costs, argues Les Murray, director, Collinson Grant.

The combined order books of Airbus and Boeing over the next 20 years provide some dizzying statistics. They have a combined backlog of more than 10,000 aircraft. Anyone who places an order today will have to wait eight years for delivery. OEMs and component suppliers could be forgiven for thinking that the good times will keep on rolling until their grandchildren start collecting their pensions.

There is, of course, a 'but' coming. These projections all underplay the commercial reality facing aircraft manufacturers that their competitively priced contracts with airlines are yielding lower margins in the face of ever rising cost pressures – not least from direct labour and staff. Volumes may well be up, but the pressure on higher service levels at lower costs is keenly felt. Recent times have seen an enormous focus on shop floor productivity improvements and the leaning out of waste. The benefits of quicker turnaround times, lower inventories, and improved safety have all helped to reduce operating costs and improve cash flow. However, the challenge is not yet overcome and the most opaque element of costs – overheads – remains to be properly tackled. Often, overheads are placed in the box marked 'too difficult' and consequently ignored. This is because managers do not know what, if any, value is added by indirect activity.

Any effort to tackle overheads should start with senior managers making serious efforts:

  • to understand the cost of the organisation and processes and match them to forecasts of demand
  • to pinpoint where to remove cost and improve profitability by highlighting opportunities to streamline processes and make them less wasteful, simpler, cheaper, faster, more effective, and consistent with good practice
  • to exploit fully the capabilities of information technology systems
  • to reduce duplication and inefficiency in management by improving the organisational structure and its managerial layers, spans of control, and costs.

Nothing starts to deal more effectively with the fear of change than unambiguous fact. A better informed understanding of structure, the activities of the staff, and patterns of work helps managers focus on the opportunities for reducing or eliminating complexity and waste. It is essential to introduce the 'voice of the customer' in completing such reviews lest political agendas creep in and institutionalised inefficiency takes root. Defining the right size and shape of the indirect organisation should be based on a thorough understanding of core, improvement and support activities; whether or not activities are related to volume; and process improvement projects. The risks of changing specific roles or even combining departments in pursuit of a savings target can only be understood when based on fact.

Any restructuring should be based on a business plan that specifies the headcount by function and department and the reason for changes by cost driver. Such reviews provide an ideal opportunity to consider a revised 'to-be' organisational structure with healthier 'layers and spans' that should seek to enrich and enlarge managerial roles and provide a clearer career path. Design is only complete when there is an implementation plan with a full assessment of risks, supported by a timetable for communications, and the adoption of improved business controls for indirect headcount.

The motivation to reduce indirect costs becomes emotionally compelling and inspiring if it is tied to a positive outcome for the business and its people. Doing so requires detailed planning on the structuring and implementation of efforts to secure the support of employees and their commitment to the necessary decisions and behavioural changes. It also requires a motivating vision of what the company can become.

The leaders of a business may be able to command that costs be cut quickly, but if people are motivated in positive ways that produce emotional as well as rational commitment, more costs will be removed earlier and the benefits will last longer. Our dilemma is that we all hate and love change at the same time; what we really want is for things to remain the same but get better. It was Harold Wilson, hardly a management guru, who offered the view that 'he who rejects change is the architect of decay'. The path of least resistance is the route taken by managers who have already lost their way.

 

* required field

Post a comment

Other Stories
Advertisement
Latest News

IBA forecasts strong headwinds for aviation in 2020

The global aviation marketplace will encounter a wide range of challenges in 2020, according to Leatherhead based independent aviation consultant IBA, which released its 2020 Market Update today.

Strategic Command welcomes Lt Gen Robert Magowan as new Deputy Commander

Lieutenant General Robert A. Magowan CB CBE has assumed his post as Strategic Command’s Deputy Commander (DComd UKStratCom).

HMS Queen Elizabeth to conduct F-35 trials in UK waters

HMS Queen Elizabeth sailed from her home port of Portsmouth on Friday to conduct flight trials with UK F-35 Lightning jets in home waters.

Aircraft deliveries in 2019 worth £29.5bn to UK

The global aerospace industry was challenged by numerous headwinds to maintaining its momentum in 2019, resulting in the lowest delivery total since 2012, with overall aircraft deliveries for the year worth up to £29.5 billion

Cobham launches Titan

Cobham Aerospace Connectivity today announced the launch of Titan, a series of aircraft audio management products for light to medium rotary and fixed-wing aircraft.

Top scientists to gain fast-tracked entry to UK

A new, fast-track visa scheme to attract the world’s top scientists, researchers and mathematicians will open on 20th February.

Rubb SK2911070220
See us at
VIDSE BT1605060320AMAS BT0312270220S&P BT241019040320FIL20BT010819260720